代写essay,代写assignment,DRS英国论文代写留学推荐网站

代寫assignment服務

五年專注阿德萊德代寫assignment 信譽保證
turnitin檢測 保證原創率 高分通過

本公司成立以來,在assignment代寫領域獲得了不錯的口碑,98%以上的客戶順利通過..歡迎大家進行咨詢和享受公司為你提供的全方位服務!不論你的assignment有多難,deadline有多急,我們將給你帶來最專業可靠的代寫assignment服務。

Order Now

阿德萊德代寫assignment GSBS6002 評分標準

    Name…………………………………………………….                Student ID………………………………………….

    Assessment criteria (Business Analysis and Foundations) – Data Analysis Report

    Marking Criteria Max
    marks
    Fail (<50) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) D
    (75-84)
    HD
    (85-100)
    Introduction 5  
    Not attempted
    Some attempt at introduction. Lack of overriding topic sentence or otherwise incomplete.
    Introduction do not cover all of report.
    Introduction uses clear topic sentence first which covers most of the report. Other sentences cover most elements of the report. Uses clear topic sentence that covers report adequately. Other sentences cover all aspects of report. Clear evidence of summary topic sentence. All other sentences clearly outline each aspect of the report.
    Inclusion of required components (e.g. Hypotheses testing) 10 Demonstrates little or no ability to develop hypotheses. In 5 or more instances either the null or alternate hypotheses are not stated or are inappropriate. Hypotheses are not clearly stated Demonstrates an adequate ability to develop hypotheses. In 3 – 4 instances, either the null or alternate hypotheses are not stated and/or are
    inappropriate. Improvement in the wording of hypotheses needed.
    Demonstrates a sound ability to develop hypotheses. In 1 - 2 instances either the null or alternate hypotheses are not stated and/or are inappropriate. In most instances hypotheses are clearly articulated. Demonstrates clear competence in developing appropriate hypotheses. In all instances both the null and alternate hypotheses are stated. In most instances hypotheses are clearly articulated. Demonstrates excellence in developing hypotheses. In all instances both the null and alternate hypotheses are stated. All hypotheses are appropriate and clearly articulated.
     
    Summary and Discussion 25 Demonstrates little or no ability to identify and accurately summarise the main findings of the report. Either draws no conclusion or draws an inappropriate conclusion with a lack of alignment to the preceding information.
    .
    Demonstrates an adequate ability to identify and summarise the main  findings of the report and/or some findings not identified.
    Draws appropriate conclusion, reiterating the main issues. There is consistency with the analysis but could be improved. The conclusion  attempts to unify the report.
    Demonstrates a sound ability to identify and accurately summarise the main findings of the report. Multiple issues identified. Draws appropriate conclusions and clearly reiterates the main issues. The conclusions are accurate, logical, and consistent with the analysis. The conclusion brings unity to the report. Demonstrates clear competence in identifying and accurately summarising the main findings of the report. Multiple issues identified. Draws appropriate conclusions and clearly reiterates the main issues. The conclusions are accurate, logical, and consistent with the analysis. The conclusion unifies the report successfully. Demonstrates excellence in identifying and accurately summarising the main findings of the report. Multiple issues identified. Draws appropriate strong conclusions and clearly reiterates the main issues. The conclusions are accurate, logical, and consistent with the analysis. The conclusion draws the report into a fully constructive analysis
    Justification of statistical analyses (basic and advanced) 40 Demonstrates little or no knowledge of statistical methods. No
    explanation of the
    analysis strategies adopted. No use of secondary materials
    Demonstrates adequate knowledge of statistical methods. Limited explanation of analysis strategies adopted and/or explanation is appropriate. Limited use of appropriate secondary sources Demonstrates sound knowledge of statistical methods. In most instances an explanation of analysis strategies adopted provided. Multiple, relevant
    secondary sources used to support explanation.
    Demonstrates competent knowledge of statistical methods. Explanation of analysis strategies adopted provided in all
    instances. Deep discussion
    in most instances. Multiple, relevant secondary sources used to support explanation
    Demonstrates excellent knowledge of statistical methods.
    Deep explanation of analysis strategies adopted provided in all instances. Multiple, relevant secondary sources used to support explanation
    Evidence of skills associated with SPSS (Preliminary Analysis) 10 Demonstrates little or no knowledge of statistical analysis and/or reporting of results. No results presented and/or are inappropriate. No statistical interpretation or managerial explanation provided or
    is inadequate.
    Demonstrates adequate knowledge of statistical analysis. Limited analysis reported. In a number of instances, analysis is inappropriate and/or incomplete. Explanation of results provided, further clarification needed in both the statistical interpretation and managerial explanation Demonstrates sound knowledge of statistical analysis. Evidence of analysis for most hypotheses stated. In most instances analysis is
    appropriate and complete.
    Explanation of results provided. Further clarification needed in either the statistical interpretation or the managerial explanation
     
    Demonstrates clear competence in statistical analysis. Evidence of appropriate and complete analysis for all hypotheses stated. A clear explanation of the statistical results provided and clearly explained for managers.
    Demonstrates excellent knowledge of statistical analysis utilising the most appropriate statistical methods flawlessly. All relevant statistics reported and correctly interpreted.
    A clear and engaging explanation of the results provided for the manager
    Report structure and presentation 10 A large number of grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors impede the reader’s comprehension of the report. No consistent style or structure within findings. No graphics used to reinforce findings. Limited evidence of appropriate referencing in-text and/or no reference list. Inadequate grasp and limited use of course terminology Several spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors are apparent in the report. These mistakes do not interfere with the report’s content, comprehension or ease of reading. Findings reflect minimal structural flaws with information organised to convey meaning to the reader.
    Limited or no attempt to use graphics to reinforce findings. Some in-text
    referencing errors evident. A
    reference list provided, some references omitted. APA referencing style followed. Limited use of course terminology and/or minor inaccuracies.
    A few minor mistakes are evident which in no way detract from the report’s content or ease of comprehension. Findings reflect a consistent structure. Information is organised and sequenced to convey the intended meaning to the reader. Graphics used to reinforce findings. Appropriate and consisting referencing provided with minimal errors. Both in-text referencing and reference list follow APA style.
    The extent and use of course terminology is adequate.
     
    All sentences are complete with grammar and punctuation correctly applied. Findings are well structured. Findings are logically organised and sequenced to convey the intended meaning to the reader allowing ease of reading. Appropriate graphics used to reinforce findings. Appropriate and consistent referencing provided with no errors (APA style). Use of course terminology is extensive and largely correct.
     
    All sentences are complete and grammatically correct with punctuation correctly applied. Findings are very well structured. Findings are very well organised and easily accessible. Appropriate and engaging graphics used to reinforce findings. Appropriate and consistent referencing provided with no errors (APA style). Extensive use of course terminology and is correct in all instances.
    Total 100 marks Final Mark : _______________/30
     

     

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Essay_Cheery
微信
Assignment代写,【essay代写】美国作业代写-留学代写ESSAY网 Dueduedue论文服务-【美国论文代写】加拿大论文ESSAY代写服务 ESSAYCASE |essay代写|assignment代写|paper代写,全球在线写作中心 EasyDue™-北美地区论文作业ESSAY代写服务机构,作业代写-覆盖100+全学科 EssayBerry:美国论文ESSAY代写服务,代写essay,统计代写,代写文章 EssayWill-论文代写网|经济代写,数学,CS代写,Assignment代写 Essaymint:专注软文代写和代写作业等服务|作业代写-100%原创高分 Essay代写,论文代写,Report代写,网课代修-浩天教育 Essay代写-Assignment「免费修改」Paper代写,-51Due留学教育 Essay代写-各学科论文代写|留学作业网课代修代做|优质的代写文章的网站